Copyright Registration Process and Procedure

Understanding Auditor as Per Companies Act 2013

Under the Companies Act, 2013, an auditor is defined as a qualified professional appointed to examine and verify a company's financial statements and records. According to Section 139 of the Act, only an individual Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, can be appointed as an auditor of a company. If the auditor is a firm, including a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), the majority of its partners practicing in India must be qualified Chartered Accountants.

The Act emphasizes the importance of auditor independence to ensure unbiased examination of financial records. An auditor must remain free from any financial interest in the company being audited and cannot have business relationships that might compromise their objectivity. This independence requirement is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the audit process and ensuring that stakeholders receive reliable financial information.

The qualification criteria are stringent to ensure that only professionals with appropriate expertise and ethical standards undertake this crucial responsibility. The Companies Act specifically disqualifies certain individuals from being appointed as auditors, including employees of the company, those indebted to the company beyond a specified limit, and those holding securities in the company or its subsidiaries.

Role of an Auditor under Companies Act

An auditor performs several vital functions within the corporate governance framework as prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Their primary role includes:

• Examining the company's financial statements to ensure they provide a true and fair view of the financial position and performance.
  
• Verifying that proper books of account have been maintained by the company as required by law
  
• Assessing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reporting any weaknesses
  
• Reporting instances of fraud, non-compliance with laws and regulations, or other material weaknesses observed during the audit process
  
• Ensuring that financial statements comply with accounting standards and relevant statutory requirements
  
• Providing an independent opinion on the financial health of the company to protect shareholder interests
  

The auditor's role extends beyond mere number checking; they serve as watchdogs who safeguard stakeholder interests by providing an objective assessment of the company's financial reporting. This independent oversight is crucial for maintaining transparency and building trust among investors, creditors, and other stakeholders.

Appointment of Auditor According to Companies Act, 2013

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines the comprehensive framework for the appointment of auditors. The process begins with the first auditor appointment, which must be completed by the Board of Directors within 30 days from the date of registration of the company. If the Board fails to appoint the first auditor within this timeframe, company members must make the appointment at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) within 90 days.

The first auditor holds office until the conclusion of the company's first Annual General Meeting (AGM). At this first AGM, a subsequent auditor is appointed who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting until the conclusion of the sixth AGM. This effectively establishes a tenure of five consecutive years for the auditor appointment.

Before finalizing the appointment, companies must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor, along with a certificate stating that the appointment meets all conditions prescribed under the Act. Additionally, the company must inform the appointed auditor of their appointment and file the appropriate notice with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Purpose of Appointment of Auditor

The appointment of a company auditor serves several critical purposes within the corporate governance framework. Primarily, auditors protect the interests of shareholders by providing an independent assessment of the company's financial position. They act as vigilant gatekeepers who examine the accounts maintained by directors and report on the company's true financial condition.

Independent auditors provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements presented by management accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance. This third-party verification builds confidence among investors, lenders, and regulatory authorities in the reliability of financial reporting.

Additionally, auditor appointments fulfill statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, helping businesses maintain legal compliance. The audit process identifies potential areas of financial risk, inefficiency, or non-compliance, allowing management to address these issues proactively. Through their objective assessment, auditors contribute significantly to improved financial discipline and transparency, which ultimately strengthens corporate governance practices.

Documents Required for Auditors Appointment

For the proper appointment of an auditor, companies must ensure they have the following essential documents:

• Written consent from the proposed auditor agreeing to the appointment
  
• A certificate from the auditor confirming eligibility and compliance with all conditions specified under the Companies Act, 2013
• Board resolution recommending the auditor's appointment to shareholders
  
• Shareholder resolution approving the appointment of the auditor
  
• Form ADT-1 for filing notice of appointment with the Registrar of Companies
  
• Copy of the auditor's Chartered Accountant certification and practice certificate
  
• Declaration of independence from the auditor confirming no conflicts of interest
  
• Letter of engagement outlining the terms of the audit assignment and responsibilities
  

Procedure for the Appointment of Auditor

Eligibility Verification

The appointment process begins with verifying the eligibility of the proposed auditor. Only a practicing Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants can be appointed as an auditor. The company must ensure the auditor doesn't fall under any disqualification criteria specified in Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Obtaining Consent and Certificate

Before appointment, the company must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor. Additionally, the auditor must provide a certificate stating that the appointment complies with all conditions prescribed under the Act and Rules. This certificate should confirm that the auditor meets independence requirements and has no conflicts of interest that might compromise audit objectivity.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors reviews the qualifications and credentials of potential auditors and passes a resolution recommending suitable candidates to shareholders. For the first auditor, the Board directly makes the appointment within 30 days of company registration.

Shareholder Approval

For subsequent auditors, the appointment requires approval from shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. The company includes the auditor appointment as an agenda item in the AGM notice, and shareholders vote on the resolution.

Filing Requirements

After appointment, the company must file Form ADT-1 with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made. This filing formally notifies regulatory authorities about the auditor appointment and includes details about the auditor's term and remuneration.

Communication to Auditor

The company must formally communicate the appointment to the auditor, specifying the tenure and terms of engagement. This communication establishes the official relationship between the company and its auditor for the designated period.

Guidelines for Appointment of Auditor for Different Types of Companies

The appointment process varies depending on the company type, as outlined below:

Changing the Auditor: Special Notice Requirements Under Companies Act

The Companies Act, 2013 establishes specific procedures when changing auditors to ensure transparency and protect auditor independence. A special notice is required in the following circumstances:

• When appointing someone other than the retiring auditor
  
• When explicitly deciding not to reappoint a retiring auditor
  
• When removing an auditor before the expiration of their term
  

The special notice requirement involves:

• Providing notice to the company at least 14 days before the general meeting
  
• The company must immediately forward a copy of this notice to the affected auditor
  
• The auditor has the right to make written representations to the company, which must be circulated to members
  
• The auditor is entitled to be heard at the meeting where the resolution is being considered
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are properly scrutinized and that auditors have an opportunity to address any concerns regarding their removal or non-reappointment. This process safeguards against arbitrary dismissals of auditors who may have discovered irregularities or disagreed with management on accounting treatments.

Rotation of an Auditor

The Companies Act, 2013 introduced mandatory auditor rotation to enhance auditor independence and audit quality. This requirement primarily applies to listed companies and certain classes of companies as specified under Section 139(2).

For individual auditors, the maximum term is one period of five consecutive years. For audit firms, the maximum term is two periods of five consecutive years each (totaling ten years). After completing the maximum term, there must be a cooling-off period of five years before the same auditor or audit firm can be reappointed.

Key aspects of auditor rotation include:

• Promotes auditor independence by preventing long-term relationships that might compromise objectivity
  
• Brings fresh perspectives to the audit process, potentially uncovering issues missed by previous auditors
  
• Enhances investor confidence in the integrity of financial statements
  
• Reduces the risk of familiarity threats between auditor and client
  

Companies must plan transitions carefully to ensure smooth handovers between outgoing and incoming auditors, maintaining audit quality throughout the process.

Re-Appointment of Retiring Auditor

A retiring auditor may be re-appointed at the Annual General Meeting provided:

• They are not disqualified for re-appointment under Section 141 of the Act
  
• They have not completed the maximum term allowed under rotation requirements
  
• They have not given notice in writing of their unwillingness to be re-appointed
  
• No special resolution has been passed appointing someone else or specifically providing that the retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed
  

The process for re-appointment typically involves:

• Board recommendation for re-appointment of the retiring auditor
  
• Obtaining fresh written consent and eligibility certificate from the auditor
  
• Placing the re-appointment resolution before shareholders at the AGM
  
• Filing the necessary forms with the Registrar after shareholder approval
  

It's important to note that the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 removed the requirement for annual ratification of auditor appointment by members at every AGM when the auditor is appointed for a five-year term.

Removal, Resignation and Replacement of an Auditor

The Companies Act provides specific provisions for handling auditor changes during their term:

• Removal before term completion: Requires special notice, Central Government approval, and a special resolution at a general meeting. The auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
  
• Resignation: An auditor may resign by filing Form ADT-3 with the company and the Registrar, stating reasons for resignation. For listed companies and certain other categories, the auditor must also file with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  
• Casual vacancy: If a vacancy arises due to resignation, the Board of Directors must fill it within 30 days. If the vacancy is due to any other reason, the Board fills it within 30 days, but the appointment must be approved by members at a general meeting within three months.
  
• Replacement procedure: When replacing an auditor, companies must follow due process including obtaining no objection certificates from the outgoing auditor and ensuring proper handover of relevant audit documents.
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are transparent, properly documented, and comply with regulatory requirements to maintain audit integrity and independence.

Conclusion

The appointment of an auditor represents a critical aspect of corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. By following the prescribed procedures for appointment, rotation, re-appointment, and removal, companies ensure compliance with legal requirements while strengthening financial transparency and accountability. The structured approach to auditor appointments-with specific provisions for different types of companies-helps maintain the independence and effectiveness of the audit function. Businesses must stay informed about these requirements and any legislative updates to ensure proper audit practices, as non-compliance can lead to penalties and reputational damage. Ultimately, a properly appointed independent auditor serves as a safeguard for stakeholder interests and contributes significantly to the overall integrity of corporate financial reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding the Role of a Director

Directors are individuals appointed by shareholders to supervise a company's activities, as guided by the Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA). Since a company is a legal entity and cannot act independently, it functions through its directors. The Board of Directors, composed of these individuals, is responsible for the company's management and decision-making.

In a Private Limited Company, directors hold significant importance. They are tasked with making everyday decisions and overseeing the company's administration. Shareholders rely on directors to manage their investments effectively and ensure the company's growth and success.

Types of Directors of a Company

Directors are categorised into various types based on their roles and responsibilities. Let us take a closer look at each type:

Executive Directors

• Actively involved in the company's daily management.
• Often hold specific executive roles, such as CEO, CFO or COO.
• Responsible for implementing the company's strategies and policies.

Non-Executive Directors

• Do not participate in the company's day-to-day management.
• Provide independent oversight to the company's board and management.
• Offer valuable insights and advice based on their expertise and experience.

Independent Directors

• A subset of non-executive directors with no financial or other vested interests in the company apart from their role as directors.
• Primary responsibility is to safeguard the interests of the company's shareholders.
• Ensure transparency and accountability in the company's operations.

Nominee Directors

• Appointed by third-party authorities or the Government to tackle mismanagement and misconduct.
• Represent the interests of the appointing authority.
• Monitor the company's activities and report any irregularities.

Appointment of Director to Private Limited Company

Specific requirements must be met when appointing directors in a Private Limited Company, these are:

• The maximum directors in a private company is 15. 
• The minimum directors in a private company is 2.
• The limit of 15 directors can be exceeded by appointing additional directors through a special resolution with the support of 75% or more shareholders.
• The appointment of directors must be in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2013.

Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013

The Companies Act 2013 includes several key provisions related to the appointment and roles of directors:

• Section 149: Details mandatory requirements, such as having a certain number of directors, including a female director and a resident director.
• Section 152: Specifies the process for appointing directors at the company's general meeting and mandates the use of the Director Identification Number (DIN).
• Section 161: Provides guidelines for appointing additional, alternate and nominee directors by the Board.
• Section 164: Lists the disqualifications for becoming a director, ensuring that only eligible individuals are appointed to the board.

By adhering to these provisions, companies can establish a well-structured and compliant board of directors.

Reasons for Adding or Changing Directors in a Company

There are several reasons why a company may choose to appoint new directors/board of directors or change its existing board composition:

1. Introducing New Talent: As a company grows, it may become necessary to bring new talent to the board to address new challenges and requirements that come with expansion.
2. Preventing Ownership Dilution: By appointing additional directors, shareholders can delegate more operational responsibilities without relinquishing strategic control.
3. Addressing Inefficiency of Current Directors: A company may appoint new directors to maintain efficiency if existing directors are underperforming due to personal issues.
4. Complying with Statutory Requirements: Companies must maintain a specific number of directors according to the Companies Act 2013. They must promptly appoint new directors to comply with legal requirements if the number falls below the minimum.

Eligibility to Be A Director in a Company

To be eligible for appointment as a director, an individual must meet the following criteria:

• Be at least 18 years old, as minors are not permitted to hold the director position.
• Not be disqualified under the provisions of the Company Act 2013, which include:
  
  • Being an undischarged insolvent
  • Having been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude
  • Having been convicted of an offence under the Companies Act 2013
  • Having been disqualified by an order of a court or tribunal
• Have mutual consent from the Board of Directors, shareholders and the individual being considered for the directorship.

It is crucial to ensure that the prospective director meets these eligibility criteria before proceeding with the appointment process.

Documents for Director Appointment

When appointing a director, the following documents are required:

1. PAN card
2. Identity proof (Voter ID, driver's license, Aadhaar card, etc.)
3. Residence proof (utility bills, rental agreement, etc.)
4. Recent passport-sized photograph
5. Digital Signature Certificate (DSC)

Procedure for Appointing/Add a Director to a Company

The process of appointing a director involves several key steps:

1. Reviewing the Articles of Association (AOA)

The first step is to review the company's Articles of Association (AOA) to ensure that it includes a clause permitting the appointment or addition of directors. If the current AOA lacks such a provision, it should be amended to include one before proceeding with the director's appointment.

2. Conducting a General Meeting for Director Appointment

The company must formally appoint a director by passing a resolution in a general meeting, either during an Annual General Meeting (AGM) or an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM). 

To arrange an EGM, the company must conduct a board meeting to pass a resolution for holding the EGM. The resolution to appoint the director must be filed in Form MGT-14 with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days.

3. Applying for Director Identification Number (DIN) & Digital Signature Certificate (DSC)

The individual selected for directorship must apply for a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) and a Director Identification Number (DIN) if they do not already possess these. After obtaining the DIN, the prospective director must provide the company with their DIN along with a declaration affirming that they are not disqualified from being a director.

4. Obtaining Consent from the Prospective Director – Form DIR-2

The individual proposed for directorship must express their consent to serve in this role by submitting Form DIR-2, a formal consent to act as a director. An individual can only be appointed as a company director by explicitly giving their consent. This step is crucial to ensure that the prospective director is willing to take on the responsibilities associated with the position.

5. Issuing a Letter of Appointment to the Director

After obtaining consent from the prospective director, the company should issue a formal Letter of Appointment. This director appointment should detail the terms and conditions of the appointment, including the director's roles, responsibilities and any remuneration or salary. The Letter of Appointment serves as a legal document that outlines the expectations and obligations of both the company and the director.

6. Filing Forms DIR-2 and DIR-12 with the ROC

Once the resolution for the appointment of a director is passed and the individual has submitted Form DIR-2, the company can officially appoint them as a director. 

The company must file both Form DIR-2 and Form DIR-12 (detailing the particulars of the director's appointment) with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days of the director's appointment. Failing to file these forms within the prescribed time frame can result in penalties and legal complications.

7. Filing Amendment Applications with GST and Tax Authorities

After appointing a new director, the company must file the necessary applications to update the director's details with various regulatory authorities, including the GST Network (GSTN) and other relevant certificates, to reflect the change in directorship. This step ensures that the company remains compliant with all legal and regulatory requirements related to its directors.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Lack of a Clear Value Proposition

A strong value proposition is the foundation of any successful fundraising pitch. Yet, many founders struggle to explain what truly sets their startup apart. VCs in India often report that over 60% of the pitches they reject fail at this first hurdle. Investors aren't just backing ideas—they're investing in solutions that address real market needs with a clear, defensible growth path.

The Impact:

• A weak or generic value proposition makes it hard for investors to see the potential for a 10x-100x return on investment.
• It raises doubts about the founder’s understanding of the market. An average investor spends less than three minutes reviewing a pitch deck; a confusing message means instant rejection.

How to Avoid It:

• Articulate your Problem-Solution Fit: Quantify the problem. Instead of "we help SMEs digitize," say "we help India's 63 million SMEs reduce their average monthly accounting overhead by 30%."
• Highlight Unique Differentiators: Is it your proprietary tech, an exclusive partnership, a revolutionary business model (e.g., unique GTM strategy for Tier-2/3 cities), or a founding team with deep domain expertise from a relevant unicorn?
• Keep it Concise: Practice a 30-second elevator pitch that clearly states the problem, solution, target market, and secret sauce.

Underestimating Market Size and Competition

Many founders present overly optimistic market size estimates, often citing a massive, irrelevant TAM. Investors quickly pick up on these gaps, which signal poor research and a weak business strategy.

The Impact:

• Claiming the entire $150 billion Indian retail market for a niche D2C fashion brand erodes credibility instantly.
• Ignoring direct and indirect competitors shows a lack of preparedness. An investor will likely know the competitive landscape better than you.

How to Avoid It:

• Use Credible Data: Back your market estimates with data from sources like NASSCOM, Bain & Company, Inc42, Tracxn, or government reports (e.g., Economic Survey of India).
• Present a Clear TAM, SAM, SOM:
  
  • Total Addressable Market (TAM): The total market demand (e.g., The entire Indian EdTech market, valued at $29 billion by 2030).
  • Serviceable Available Market (SAM): The segment you can target (e.g., K-12 test prep market in India, estimated at $10 billion).
  • Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM): What you can realistically capture in 3-5 years (e.g., 1-2% of the SAM, representing a $100-$200 million revenue opportunity).
• Showcase Competitive Analysis: Create a competitive matrix that maps key players against features, pricing, and market share. Clearly articulate your unique edge.

Insufficient Due Diligence on Investors

In the rush to secure funding, many startups forget that an investor-founder relationship is a long-term partnership, often lasting 7-10 years. Not every investor is the right fit for your business.

The Impact:

• Misaligned goals can lead to conflict. An investor seeking a quick 2-year exit will clash with a founder building for long-term market leadership.
• Some investors carry reputational risks or have a portfolio full of conflicting companies, which can harm your business.

How to Avoid It:

• Research Investor Portfolios: Use platforms like Tracxn or Crunchbase to see their past investments, sector focus, typical cheque size, and involvement level.
• Conduct "Reverse Due Diligence": Talk to at least 2-3 founders from their portfolio. Ask about their experience, the value-add beyond capital, and how the investor behaves during challenging times.
• Ensure Vision Alignment: Discuss your long-term vision, potential exit scenarios, and governance expectations before signing the term sheet.

‍

Poor Financial Projections

Financial projections aren’t just numbers on a slide—they're a reflection of your business acumen. Investors expect thoughtful, data-driven projections that are realistic and achievable.

The Impact:

• Projecting 100% month-on-month growth for 36 months without validated unit economics (CAC, LTV) is a major red flag.
• Unrealistic forecasts that show profitability in six months for a deep-tech R&D startup diminish trust in your planning abilities.

How to Avoid It:

• Build Bottom-Up Projections: Base your forecasts on key drivers: marketing spend, conversion rates, sales team efficiency, production capacity, and churn rates.
• Show Key Metrics: Clearly state your assumptions for Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), Lifetime Value (LTV), Churn Rate, and Monthly Burn Rate. A healthy LTV/CAC ratio (ideally >3:1) is a strong positive signal.
• Present Scenarios: Show a baseline (most likely), an optimistic, and a conservative case. This demonstrates strategic thinking.

‍

Ignoring Legal and Regulatory Compliance

This is one of the most critical and overlooked areas. Non-compliance with Indian regulations can kill a deal during due diligence.

The Impact:

• Legal and compliance issues are a leading cause for fundraising delays, with 25-30% of deals facing hurdles at the due diligence stage due to poor documentation.
• Non-compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, or FDI norms can lead to hefty penalties, voiding of share allotment, or even criminal proceedings.

How to Avoid It:

• Maintain a "Virtual Data Room" (VDR): Keep all documents audit-ready. This includes:
  
  • Corporate Documents: Certificate of Incorporation, Memorandum of Association (MoA), Articles of Association (AoA).
  • Secretarial Records: Up-to-date statutory registers, board minutes, and shareholder resolutions.
  • Cap Table: A clean, accurate capitalization table. Any discrepancy here is a major red flag.
  • IP: All intellectual property assignments from founders, employees, and consultants are properly documented.
  • Employee Documentation: Compliant employment agreements and a properly structured and approved Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP).
• Comply with FDI Regulations: If raising from foreign investors, ensure compliance with FEMA (Foreign Exchange Management Act) regulations, including sectoral caps, pricing guidelines, and timely reporting to the RBI through the FIRMS portal (Form FC-GPR must be filed within 30 days of share allotment).
• Engage Professionals: Work with a qualified Company Secretary (CS) and a corporate lawyer from day one. The cost is negligible compared to the cost of a failed funding round.

‍

Overvaluing Your Startup

An inflated valuation without the backing of strong metrics can scare off investors. The Indian market has seen valuation corrections, with late-stage valuations dropping by 20-25% in 2023.

The Impact:

• A high valuation sets unrealistic expectations, making future rounds difficult and increasing the risk of a "down round," which demoralizes employees and signals distress to the market.
• For a pre-revenue idea, asking for a ₹50 Crore ($6 million) valuation will likely get you laughed out of the room. A typical Indian idea-stage valuation is in the ₹5-15 Crore ($0.6M - $1.8M) range.

How to Avoid It:

• Benchmark Your Valuation: Research recent deals in your sector and stage in India. A seed-stage SaaS startup with ₹1 Crore ($120k) in ARR might command a valuation between ₹10-20 Crore (10x-20x ARR), not ₹100 Crore.
• Focus on Building Value: Traction speaks louder than projections. Show month-on-month growth in users, revenue, or engagement before demanding a premium valuation.
• Be Negotiable: Use convertible instruments like iSAFE notes (India Simple Agreement for Future Equity) to defer the valuation discussion to a later, metrics-backed round.

‍

Focusing Solely on Equity Funding

Equity isn't the only option. India's venture debt market has grown significantly, with over $1.2 billion disbursed in 2023. Overlooking alternatives can lead to unnecessary dilution.

The Impact:

• Selling 20-25% of your company at the seed stage can lead to founders having less than 50% ownership by Series A, reducing their control and motivation.
• You may be missing out on non-dilutive capital that is better suited for your needs (e.g., funding inventory).

How to Avoid It:

• Explore Venture Debt: If you have predictable revenue streams, venture debt can fund working capital or marketing expenses with minimal dilution (1-2% warrant coverage vs. 20% equity).
• Look into Grants and Government Schemes: Investigate programs like the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS), SIDBI Fund of Funds, and various state-level grants that provide capital without taking equity.
• Consider Revenue-Based Financing: For businesses with recurring revenue (SaaS, D2C subscriptions), platforms offer capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue, with no equity dilution.

Rushing the Fundraising Process

Fundraising is a marathon, not a sprint. The pressure to secure capital often leads to a rushed process, resulting in bad deals or missed opportunities.

The Impact:

• A rushed pitch appears unprofessional and unprepared. Investors can sense desperation.
• Founders often accept the first term sheet they receive, which may have predatory clauses (e.g., aggressive liquidation preferences, broad veto rights).

How to Avoid It:

• Plan for a 4-6 Month Cycle: The average fundraising process in India, from the first outreach to money in the bank, takes 4-6 months. Start well before your cash runs out.
• Prepare a Target List: Research and build a list of 50-100 relevant investors. Fundraising is a numbers game. You might need 100+ conversations to get 1-2 term sheets.

Build Relationships Early: Don't reach out to investors only when you need money. Connect with them on LinkedIn, share updates, and seek advice months in advance. A warm introduction from a trusted source increases your chance of getting a meeting by over 10x.